top of page

Design support transformed by signal and communications DX: balancing efficiency and accuracy with point cloud data × AR

By LRTK Team (Lefixea Inc.)

All-in-One Surveying Device: LRTK Phone
text explanation of LRTK Phone

In recent years, the wave of digital transformation (DX) has reached the railway signal and communications sector. Signal and communications DX refers to initiatives that incorporate the latest digital technologies into the design and construction management of signaling and communications equipment, aiming to simultaneously achieve improvements in work efficiency and the assurance of design accuracy—objectives that were difficult to balance with conventional methods. This article focuses on new design support methods that utilize point cloud data (3D scans) and AR (augmented reality) technologies, and explains in detail how signal and communications design work is changing.


Required accuracy, placement control, and construction constraints in signal and communications design

When designing railway signal and communications equipment, extremely high accuracy and strict placement control are required. For example, the position and height of signals or communication antennas installed along the track must sometimes allow no deviation of even a few centimeters (a few tenths of an inch) to ensure visibility from trains and maintain required clearances from other equipment. Cable routing and lengths must also be calculated accurately in advance, including consideration of slack (allowance). Because signal and communications equipment operate in coordination with multiple devices, each piece of equipment’s placement can affect the entire system; therefore, rigorous examination and verification at the design stage are indispensable.


Moreover, construction constraints unique to the railway environment must be taken into account. In many cases, work must be carried out during limited time windows at night or during service suspensions so as not to stop train operations, and it is essential to ensure that installations are completed correctly on the first attempt to avoid rework in the field. Working at height where scaffolding is difficult to secure, operations near the tracks, or locations where heavy machinery cannot be used for safety reasons—all present highly varied construction conditions. To complete installation work as planned under these constraints, it is important to accurately understand the site and prepare detailed placement plans from the design stage. With conventional methods, even with meticulous planning based on drawings and on-site surveys, discrepancies with actual site conditions often led to later revisions.


Conventional workflow for design, on-site verification, and placement checks, and their challenges

Traditionally, signal and communications equipment design relied on paper drawings and 2D CAD, and on-site verification and placement checks depended heavily on human visual inspection and manual tasks. The common workflow was to first do a site reconnaissance, measure necessary dimensions by hand or with a total station, prepare drawings back at the office, and then review the design. After that, designers would return to the site with the drawings, mark planned positions with stakes or chalk, and check whether the plan fit the actual scene. Additional surveys were sometimes required; if unexpected obstacles or constraints were found, drawings had to be revised and matched to the site again, resulting in repeated trial-and-error cycles.


However, this process had several issues. First, it was time-consuming and labor-intensive. Surveying and staking typically require multiple people, and if work occurs at night, staffing and safety management burdens increase. Each cycle of verification and revision takes days, which can create heavy pressure when schedules are tight.


Second, there are accuracy and reliability issues. Manual surveying and layout work are not immune to human error. Small mistakes—measurement errors with tapes, misreading survey points, misplacing stakes—can accumulate and cause equipment locations to shift. Experienced technicians may notice and correct such errors from experience, but less-experienced staff can easily overlook them, meaning there was a significant reliance on the intuition and experience of skilled workers.


Third, there is the problem of information sharing and gaps in understanding. It is not easy to accurately convey the completed image in the designer’s head to construction personnel, subcontractors, or the client. Following symbols and dimensions on a paper drawing makes it difficult to imagine how things will look on site, and especially in areas with complex terrain or many existing structures, it was hard for everyone to share the same understanding from drawings alone. As a result, mismatches leading to “this is not what we expected” occurred, with the constant risk of rework or additional work during construction.


Thus, conventional analog-centric methods had many bottlenecks in achieving both high-precision placement planning and efficient work. How can DX technologies address these issues? The next chapter examines the innovations brought by 3D point cloud data and AR technology.


Using point cloud data to capture current 3D conditions and evaluate pole/equipment installation spaces

First, attention should be paid to capturing site conditions in 3D using point cloud data. Point cloud data are 3D models composed of many points obtained by laser scanners or photogrammetry, reproducing site terrain and structures as a dense collection of points. In recent years, point clouds can be acquired not only by tripod-mounted 3D laser scanners but also by drone-based aerial surveys and LiDAR-equipped smartphones for easy scanning, and their use in railway infrastructure is expanding.


The greatest advantage of using point cloud data is that you can realistically reproduce site conditions on your desk. For example, when erecting a new signal pole, you can check the spatial relationships with existing tracks, catenary poles, and surrounding structures in 3D while viewing the point cloud. Paper drawings only provide planar information, but a 3D view of the point cloud allows you to grasp spatial clearance including height at a glance, so you can intuitively evaluate questions like “Will this equipment interfere with other equipment if installed here?” or “Will it obstruct worker passage or sightlines?” With colored point clouds that reproduce scenery like photographs, even junior staff who struggle with reading drawings can more easily share spatial images, enabling accurate decisions without relying on the experience of veterans.


Furthermore, point clouds allow you to freely measure and simulate. You can read ground elevation at the planned installation location, measure distances from the track center, or confirm clearances from surrounding structures—tasks that previously required repeated on-site measurements can now be done on a PC. For example, when placing an equipment box that houses signaling gear beside the track, you can use point cloud data to check for flat spaces and distances from other equipment to narrow down the optimal placement. Because overhead obstacles such as catenary wires and trees are visualized in the point cloud, you can also pre-check for vertical conflicts (for example, whether upward clearance would be sufficient if an antenna were installed).


Point cloud use is also powerful for remote consensus building. If a 3D model is shared via the cloud, designers at headquarters and related departments can understand site conditions from their screens, enabling remote site attendance. In fact, one railway operator scanned the site for a new signaling installation and used point cloud data for remote attendance and land-use discussions within the company. Everyone can discuss while confirming the same 3D space, reducing gaps in understanding and speeding up the review process.


In this way, capturing the current 3D situation with point cloud data makes it possible to “bring the whole site back to the office” at the design stage and serves as a powerful means to accurately verify pole and equipment installation spaces. Combining this with the AR technology introduced next can dramatically improve efficiency in on-site verification tasks.


Benefits of on-site placement support and visual verification using smartphone RTK + AR

Even after desk-based review using point cloud data, the final step is to correctly lay out installation positions on site and perform construction. Here, the combination of smartphone RTK and AR (augmented reality) provides strong support for on-site placement. RTK (real-time kinematic) is a high-precision positioning technology that, when used with a compatible GNSS receiver, can determine current position with an accuracy of several centimeters (a few tenths of an inch). In recent years, products that attach small high-precision GNSS receivers to smartphones for RTK positioning have appeared, making centimeter-level positioning easy without dedicated equipment.


Combining AR technology—which overlays digital information onto live site imagery through the smartphone screen—with this high-precision positioning information allows designers’ planned positions and heights to be projected accurately on site. For example, if you point a smartphone at a planned location for a signal pole, a virtual pole or foundation model appears at that location. Where stakes or spray marks were traditionally used to indicate “this is where it will be installed,” AR displays the position on the screen with exactitude, enabling placement verification as if the object were actually there instantly. The need to compare paper drawings and re-measure by saying “this is the ○ m point so…” is reduced, and even less-experienced personnel can derive installation positions by following the smartphone display, reducing human error and aiding skill transfer.


Visual verification with AR has many advantages. First, it allows you to share design intent on the spot. Through a smartphone or tablet screen, all stakeholders can simultaneously see the post-completion image, eliminating the need for veterans to verbally explain their mental image to new staff. If everyone can confirm “this is what will be installed at this location” on site, mismatches in recognition that lead to rework can be prevented. Also, when explaining to clients or nearby stakeholders, showing AR imagery makes understanding immediate.


Next is construction efficiency. Performing a “virtual layout” (virtual staking) with AR can greatly simplify marking tasks that would otherwise require physical stakes or chalk. If a virtual mark is displayed on the smartphone based on design coordinates, it serves directly as the reference for layout, so you can accurately indicate positions even on bedrock or slopes where stakes could not be driven. On sites where layout was performed by confirming AR-overlaid design data, reports indicate less need to repeatedly spread drawings and redo layouts, shortening meetings and work time. Proceeding while confirming positions with AR gives confidence to install correctly on the first attempt, which is especially reassuring for one-shot night work.


Thus, smartphone RTK + AR digitizes the on-site placement verification process itself, dramatically improving efficiency and accuracy. How can these technologies solve concrete issues encountered during actual construction—such as obstacle checks, line-of-sight problems, and cable slack? The next chapter examines this in detail.


Applications for on-site obstacle checks, sightline verification, and cable slack confirmation

Smartphone RTK and AR technologies can be applied to various on-site verification tasks. Typical examples include the following situations for obstacle checks, sightline verification, and cable slack confirmation.


Obstacle checks (physical interference checks): You can check in advance whether a newly installed signal or communications pole will physically interfere with existing equipment or surrounding structures. By projecting a 3D model of the equipment onto the actual scene with AR, you can check—at true scale—whether, for example, “if a new signal is installed here, will the distance to the adjacent fence or catenary pole be sufficient?” or “will it encroach on the passage space for work vehicles?” If point cloud data is available, you can also perform automated interference checks in 3D before bringing models to the field, identifying potential obstacles before arriving on site.

Sightline verification (visibility and recognition checks): For signals this includes the driver’s line of sight; for surveillance cameras it includes visibility of the monitored area. Such requirements related to viewing angles can be simulated with AR. By holding a smartphone at the driver’s eye height and viewing the AR overlay on site, you can check whether a planned signal will be visible from around a curve at the appropriate distance or whether it will be hidden by other structures. Conventionally, visibility ranges were drawn on diagrams or test lighting was used to check visibility, but with AR you can intuitively evaluate the “appearance” before construction, helping to prevent rework. Uses combining point cloud data and BIM models to evaluate signal placement from a driver’s viewpoint have already been undertaken, making DX-enabled detailed sightline verification a reality.

Cable slack confirmation (checking cable routes and lengths): Signal and communications installations involve many cables, and AR/point cloud technologies are useful for routing and slack considerations. For example, when routing a cable from a new signal to a control cabinet, you can check on point cloud data whether there are obstacles along the route and whether bend radii and vertical clearances are acceptable. By drawing virtual cables or lines on AR that follow the terrain, you can visualize required cable lengths and the number of supports. Additionally, using smartphone RTK to accurately locate existing cable conduits enables verification of whether there is space to pull new cables. These capabilities help eliminate uncertainties at the planning stage and prevent problems at construction like “not enough cable” or “route changes.”


In this way, AR and point cloud data support a wide range of on-site verification tasks and enable a smooth transition from design to construction. Next, let’s look at the workflow for sharing these digital data within a team and reflecting them in design drawings.


Cloud sharing of measurement data, BIM integration, automatic reflection into design drawings, and labor saving

Digital data obtained with DX tools deliver even greater value when shared via the cloud. Traditionally, survey measurements and annotations made on drawings were taken back by staff and manually entered into drawings, or distributed to stakeholders by email or paper. In a DX environment, coordinates, point clouds, and photos acquired on site can be uploaded to the cloud on the spot and immediately shared across the team. For example, it is technically possible to send survey results from the field and have a remote designer receive the data in real time to update drawings. Consolidated cloud information functions as a single source of truth, preventing trouble such as “which drawing is the latest?” or “site and design have different understandings.” If you provide a web-based 3D viewer for point clouds and design models, people without dedicated software can still check site conditions via a browser, enabling smooth cross-departmental information sharing and decision-making.


Regarding the utilization of design data, BIM/CIM integration is also key. BIM/CIM are 3D information models used in the architecture and civil engineering sectors, and their adoption in infrastructure is progressing. Point cloud data are used to create current BIM models, and high-precision coordinates obtained on site are used for model reconciliation and placement studies. For example, you can update above-ground equipment BIM models based on acquired point clouds or overlay designed signal BIM objects onto current point clouds to verify visibility and clearances. Some DX tools also allow direct AR display of 2D CAD data (DWG, etc.) and 3D design models, enabling a direct digital link between design drawings ⇔ the field.


Moreover, attempts are underway to automatically reflect field-acquired data into design drawings. Examples include importing coordinate lists recorded in a surveying app into drawings with one click, or converting cloud-organized field information directly into deliverable drawings and ledgers for electronic submission. Automating the data entry and drawing revision tasks that were previously manual could dramatically reduce workload for designers and construction managers. While one goal of DX is to improve field work efficiency, it is also important to reduce office-based data processing and coordination tasks. By centering workflows on cloud and BIM, field and design can be seamlessly linked so that all stakeholders work from the same real-time information, leading to significant labor savings and reduced errors.


Outlook for DX use toward digital standardization of signal and communications design work

DX adoption in the signal and communications field is expected to expand and lead to digital standardization of operations. Although currently implemented in some advanced projects, under initiatives like the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism’s i-Construction and the promotion of BIM/CIM, processes incorporating 3D data and AR into the design and construction of signaling and communications equipment are likely to become standard. In the future, a workflow consistently based on digital data might be established—from site surveys to design, construction management, and maintenance—representing a major shift away from traditional paper drawings and manual methods.


For example, site workers may routinely carry AR-capable devices (smart glasses or tablets) that project design drawings and instructions into their field of view in real time. A cloud-hosted “digital twin” with synchronized latest design models and site progress could enable managers in the office to monitor site conditions via AR and issue instructions remotely. Positioning technology is also expected to advance further; with broader availability of centimeter-class augmentation signals from Japan’s quasi-zenith satellite system Michibiki (CLAS) and improvements in multi-GNSS, stable high-precision positioning and AR display may become possible even in environments that were previously difficult, such as mountainous areas or under viaducts.


The DX wave will extend beyond process changes to talent development and safety management. Intuitive 3D and AR tools can shorten the training period for junior engineers and allow veteran expertise to be accumulated and shared as data, reducing dependence on individual skills. Conducting digital simulations of on-site work in advance can reduce risk and enhance safety. These changes will contribute not only to efficiency gains but also to industry-wide work-style reform and productivity improvements.


Thus, DX use in signal and communications design is expected to become commonplace and promote digital standardization of workflows. As technologies mature, broader use cases and cross-field collaboration can be expected, advancing design and construction management in the signal and communications field toward smarter and more sophisticated practices.


Summary: high-precision surveying with LRTK and its application to design support

The efficient and high-precision design support using point cloud data and AR introduced here is entering practical use. One solution that makes AR × high-precision positioning easily achievable on site is a system called LRTK. LRTK consists of a small high-precision GNSS receiver that attaches to a smartphone, a dedicated app, and cloud services; with this single unit it provides centimeter-class positioning (centimeter-level accuracy (half-inch accuracy)), 3D point cloud scanning, drift-free AR display, and coordinate-based navigation (staking guidance). Tasks that previously required skilled surveyors and expensive equipment can, with LRTK, be handled by on-site personnel with a smartphone, and the acquired data can be shared to the cloud and reflected in design drawings immediately. Introducing tools like LRTK into signal and communications design and construction management could transform everyday workflows.


Digital technologies are blurring the boundary between “site” and “design,” ushering in an era in which everyone can share the same accurate information to advance projects. Through signal and communications DX initiatives, we hope to realize smart railway infrastructure development that balances safety and efficiency.


Next Steps:
Explore LRTK Products & Workflows

LRTK helps professionals capture absolute coordinates, create georeferenced point clouds, and streamline surveying and construction workflows. Explore the products below, or contact us for a demo, pricing, or implementation support.

LRTK supercharges field accuracy and efficiency

The LRTK series delivers high-precision GNSS positioning for construction, civil engineering, and surveying, enabling significant reductions in work time and major gains in productivity. It makes it easy to handle everything from design surveys and point-cloud scanning to AR, 3D construction, as-built management, and infrastructure inspection.

bottom of page