Introduction
In building and social infrastructure inspections, infrared visual inspection has recently attracted attention as a non-destructive testing method. By visualizing surface temperature with an infrared camera (thermography), it is possible to detect deterioration and anomalies that are difficult to find with the naked eye—such as detached or delaminated exterior tiles, internal moisture, and abnormal heating of electrical equipment—over wide areas in a short time. Inspections can be conducted safely in high or hard-to-reach locations, and the need for scaffolding or hammer sounding tests can be reduced, which is another major benefit. Many building managers, maintenance contractors, and municipalities have begun adopting infrared visual inspection aiming for inspections with “no misses.” However, conventional methods still have issues in recording and locating findings.
This article organizes the principles of infrared visual inspection and the problems of conventional approaches, and explains how linking them with the smart inspection tool “LRTK” achieves higher precision and efficiency. By leveraging digital technologies such as 3D scanning, geotagged photos, AR navigation, and cloud integration, we specifically show how to dramatically improve the accuracy and reproducibility of inspection records and streamline reporting tasks. Finally, we discuss the potential for simple surveying and broader smart inspection applications using LRTK.
What is Infrared Visual Inspection
Infrared visual inspection is a non-destructive testing technique that photographs the surface temperature distribution of the target (such as building exteriors, structural members, or equipment enclosures) with an infrared thermography camera to infer internal anomalies. For example, if an exterior tile is detached from its substrate leaving a void, its daytime heat retention and nighttime cooling will differ from intact areas, causing that surface area to appear anomalously hotter or colder. Likewise, areas where rainwater has penetrated and dampened concrete, missing insulation, or thermal bridges (places where heat leaks through structural members) can be detected as temperature irregularities. For electrical equipment enclosures, loose or deteriorated wiring connections, overheating due to deterioration, and abnormal heating of motors or transformers can be detected via infrared. Because you can visualize invisible defects by “temperature,” infrared visual inspection offers the major advantage of enabling early detection of latent problems that would be missed by visual inspection or sounding.
Moreover, infrared diagnostics are non-contact and non-destructive and can cover wide areas at once, making them time-efficient. High exterior walls can be examined from the ground or a distance simply by pointing a camera, reducing the need for workers to approach and improving safety. The frequency of erecting scaffolding or using elevated work platforms for long periods can be reduced, minimizing impact on building users and the surrounding environment. Inspection results can also be stored as digital images, enabling long-term tracking of degradation trends for each building and serving as materials for repair planning. For these reasons, infrared visual inspection is spreading as a new standard for periodic inspections, contributing to building safety maintenance and asset value preservation.
On the other hand, infrared visual inspection has weaknesses. Results are easily influenced by environmental conditions at the time of shooting (temperature, solar radiation, wind, etc.), so adjusting shooting time and considering weather are essential for accurate diagnosis. There are also operational issues regarding how discovered anomalies are recorded and reported. The next section summarizes the main problems of conventional infrared visual inspection and the issues they cause in the field.
Problems in Conventional Infrared Visual Inspection
In conventional visual inspections using infrared cameras, the following issues have been pointed out:
• Locating and recording anomalies is cumbersome: It is not easy to determine later exactly where an anomaly captured on a thermographic image corresponds on the building. Typically, inspectors manually mark corresponding visible-light photos or drawings, but identifying a location such as “detachment located on the north face of Building XX, center of the 3rd floor, at ○ m from the …” across a large façade with repeating patterns is tedious and prone to recording errors or mistaken placement. Analog methods like photographing a blackboard or note with each shot to record date and location complicate later data organization.
• Risk of missed inspections: When a person conducts an inspection holding an infrared camera and visually scanning, there is inevitably a risk of oversight. For large buildings or bridges, if the shooting coverage isn’t made thorough, some parts may remain uninspected. Low camera resolution at height can miss fine details, and overlaps or gaps in visible coverage can occur. Relying on human intuition and experience for coverage can lead to situations where “one spot was accidentally missed without us noticing.”
• Utilization and reproducibility of recorded data: Even if infrared images and reports are prepared, it is not easy to use that data in the next inspection or quantitatively compare long-term changes. Conventional practice often involved noting anomaly locations only on paper reports or 2D drawings, making it time-consuming for another inspector to relocate the same spot later. Because the data is not linked with coordinate or quantitative information, comparisons such as “how large was the anomaly detected previously” or “which anomalies are newly appearing this time” must rely on subjective judgment. Despite non-destructive inspection, the results could not be fully utilized for long-term maintenance planning.
• Inefficiency in reporting work: Preparing post-inspection reports is also labor-intensive. Organizing a large number of infrared images, plotting each corresponding position on drawings, and creating photo ledgers require significant time and effort. Because field information is taken back to the office and manually compiled, there is a time lag from inspection to report submission, making prompt response to urgent anomalies difficult. Paper records or USB-based data management do not facilitate smooth information sharing among stakeholders, and valuable investigation results may not be fully utilized.
As described above, while infrared visual inspection itself is useful, operational challenges remain, such as “accurate recording of location,” “prevention of missed inspections,” “data reusability,” and “prompt reporting.” How can we solve these issues to achieve “zero misses” in precise inspections? One answer is transitioning to smart inspections that use digital technologies. Particularly noteworthy is the use of the compact device LRTK, which links with smartphones to acquire highly accurate location information.
What is the Smart Inspection Tool “LRTK”
LRTK is an ultra-compact, high-precision positioning device that attaches to and is used with a smartphone. Developed by a startup originating from the Tokyo Institute of Technology, this tool allows you to mount a receiver weighing approximately 150 g and with a thickness of about 1 cm (0.4 in) on your smartphone and achieve centimeter-level positioning accuracy (half-inch accuracy) using real-time kinematic correction technology (RTK) for satellite positioning (GPS, etc.). High-precision positioning that previously required specialized equipment costing millions of yen and skilled operators can now be handled easily with a smartphone + LRTK. Furthermore, LRTK is not just a positioning device; by integrating with various smartphone sensors and apps, it functions as an all-in-one smart inspection platform.
Specifically, using LRTK enables the following functions on a smartphone:
• High-precision position acquisition: Measuring any point on a building or bridge can record latitude, longitude, and height with about 1–2 cm (0.4–0.8 in) error. Ordinary smartphone GPS has an error of around 5 m (16.4 ft), making it unsuitable for precise location identification, but LRTK reduces error to the limit using RTK positioning with correction information. Accurate positioning is possible even on scaffolding or large sites. It also supports Japan’s quasi-zenith satellite high-precision positioning service (CLAS), enabling stable positioning even in areas where communication or satellite reception is unstable, such as mountainous regions or streets of high-rise buildings.
• 3D scanning (point cloud measurement): Combined with a smartphone’s LiDAR sensor or camera, you can acquire surrounding structural shapes as 3D point cloud data. By attaching LRTK-provided position coordinates to each point, the entire acquired point cloud model can be given accurate geographic coordinates. This allows anomalies detected by the infrared camera to be positioned and recorded on a 3D model of the entire building. Storing inspection results that were conventionally managed on flat drawings as a three-dimensional digital model for sharing is a major innovation.
• AR navigation and location guidance: It supports AR (augmented reality) functions that overlay digital information on real-world images through the smartphone screen. For example, AR display can guide a pre-set inspection route or shooting points so that you can巡回 without missing shots even on large structures. Besides preventing missed inspections, you can project markers for recorded anomalies to intuitively locate them on site. Even anomalies in high places can be indicated from a safe distance through the camera, allowing workers to verify locations remotely without approaching hazardous spots.

